Category: Political Communication
Young people becoming members of an online political party community is rare, because they prefer to read and share political news only for information. Apparently, there’s already much discussions about politics at home, in news media outlets and in townhalls where adults meet for community projects.
Not a few social behavior experts believe that it’s alright for the youth to just stick to online communities dedicated to their favorite games.
Although they tend to be exposed to inflammatory language and personal insults, many have learned to take such behaviors with a grain of salt, since they are all part of the gaming culture.
Online Political Communities Can Be Used for Different Motives
Political online communities however can have different motives in bringing like-minded people together. While an online community for a specific political party gives affiliated voters a dedicated space to use in weighing in the qualities of their party’s nominees, not all politically oriented communities function as tools for democratic processes.
Online political communities may be formed by far right or far left groups. Meetings and discussion focus on rallying members to participate in movements that promote their ideologies amidst a democratic form of society. The detriments of these types of political online communities is that some members acted on their own to launch violent actions. Others use their political online space in sending out secret messages as a means to gather large groups of people, as was the case in the January 06, 2021 Capitol Hill riot.
In some cases, online political communities are also used in spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories merely to influence or destroy the integrity of well-meaning government projects. As a result, they hinder the carrying out of public initiatives designed to work for the good all.
Online Political Communities Used by Some Governments to Stop Oppositionists
While young people throughout the globe have access to a broad range of political topics affecting their respective country, they can become targets of the so-called red tag movements. In some European and Asian countries, young people comprising college students, university or college professors, art activists and other members of civic organizations can be red tagged for their political opinions, especially if contradicting or criticizing government actions.
During the November 2020 presidential elections, the youths became active participants in campaigning for Joe Biden even without participation in online communities. The political development of the American youths depend mainly on the social media site they use, the beliefs and ideologies supported by celebrities they look up to as icons in their field and their grass roots environment among other things. Once in a while, video game players welcome political discussions in their online gaming community but only as part of an ongoing banter.
In the F95zone online gaming community, which is dedicated to players of adult games, political issues can also crop up as part of a topic for discussion. After all, adult games are different because they contain content that more or less are true-to-life. Adult game players believe it’s one way of keep their feet firmly planted on the ground when going about their daily routines
While politics may crop up as a topic, F95 Zone members who have contradicting views are free to state their opinion without fear of being ridiculed or shamed for the political party they support. As participating members of the F95 Zone Community, they observe the importance of communicating with respect and of giving value to general consensus.Read More
Politics is an extremely complex area of human relations. These interests are often mutually exclusive. Nowadays, this term is often used to refer to various types of influence and leadership. Politics is defined as a sphere of activity related to the distribution and exercise of power within the state and between states in order to achieve the security of society.
In the broadest sense, politics is interpreted only as activities to organize the joint life of people in society, as a necessary and useful management in this regard. And political relations – as a system of relations between people, which arise and develop precisely about the organization and functioning of state power.
The existence and status of a policy depends on a number of factors. These stable necessary factors, or connections, are the laws of politics . These connections include the following:
The policy is built by the one who lacks security: in benefits, including in life and health, in social status, communication, etc. Who possesses large resources dictates the conditions of political (collective) existence; that is, the one who is less interested dictates.
The dependence of the joint security of the community on the fairness of the distribution of social positions of the subjects of politics. Security has three main elements. Social security implies the preservation of the existence of the subject in a certain status. Economic security means having access to livelihoods.
Politics as a social phenomenon
- traditional , when politics is determined through the state and people’s participation in the implementation or opposition of power;
- sociological , within which politics is interpreted in the broadest sense, as any type of social activity associated with the independent leadership of people, the distribution of benefits and resources, the settlement of conflicts, etc. In the traditional approach, politics appears as a special, different from others, state-power sphere of public life and is realized in it.
the scope of the struggle for power and the way of exercising this power; science and art of public administration; method of producing legal social orders and instructions, etc. In the sociological approach, politics as a public activity is not necessarily associated with state power, and, therefore, does not form a special sphere of public life.
It is present everywhere, and any phenomenon or action acquires a political character insofar as it “affects the organization and mobilization of resources necessary for the implementation of the goals of a particular team, community, etc.” Therefore, they often say: “Wherever you go, politics is everywhere.” She is present even in the family, when a smart wife controls her husband in such a way that it seems to the latter that he is the master of the house, although in fact he is under his wife’s thumb.Read More
Electronic democracy (e-democracy) or e-participation are collective terms for different forms of political participation via new media, especially the Internet, which enable citizens to participate in political decision-making processes. They are to be distinguished from forms of e-government, which aim only at the optimization and modernization of administrative processes through information and communication technology.
The digital change is taking place in many areas of life. It affects society and everyday life and does not stop at politics and democracy. This necessarily leads to consequences for the development of democracy and participation. Around the triangle of internet, politics and democracy, so-called net politics has outlined an independent field of politics, the importance and governance structures of which is being struggled for in society and in party politics.
The Internet itself is apolitical. As a technical aid, however, it offers a variety of options to facilitate the accessibility of political information and political participation as well as the exchange between politics and citizens and within civil society. Online discussions, online voting, online petitions, and online campaigns are specific ways in which citizens can participate and exert political influence. This is where the internet’s democratic potential lies.
Limits and Dangers
Questions of data protection and data security are connected with the use of the Internet and e-mails as well as malaysia seo. The Internet is seen as the ideal way to initiate more citizen participation and increased civic engagement. The new interactive communication and participation options are seen as an opportunity to revive democracy.
In parts of the discussion, there is a technical enthusiasm that suggests that the offer of new technology and a technical infrastructure alone is sufficient to initiate new forms of engagement and participation. But the potential of the internet does not realize itself, it has to be consciously designed and shaped.
Technology does not solve the problems of participation and engagement. Technology can only be the means in the hands of social actors to solve problems. Especially since the Internet not only solves problems, but also intensifies existing problems (marginalization) or creates new problems of its own accord (digital divide in society). Short-term and quick successes are just as unlikely as the solution to the great problems of democracy.
Challenges and tendencies
Without the mass media public losing any of its importance, a series of political processes will take place on the Internet (political information, opinion-forming and deliberation, agenda setting, organization and mobilization) and will radiate to the mass media public in the form of topics, debates and political actions.
The formation of “virtual” political communication communities (based on political interests, sensitivities, topics, world views) is facilitated by the Internet. This not only increases the diversity of political communication, but also the segmentation of the public.
The demands of politically interested and well-informed citizens with regard to access to political information, the transparency of political processes and also participation in decision-making via the Internet will grow.
For user groups with little competence in dealing with the possibilities of political communication and information on the Internet (due to socio-economic status, educational qualification, age), the Internet can remain closed as a source of political information and participation.
As a negative side effect, the openness of the network also implies a lack of quality assurance bodies. The assessment of the reliability and seriousness of the diverse information and sources available on the Internet and the corresponding selection processes could not only pose problems for the last-named user groups.
Whether for the election campaign , for mobilization or for information – with the right strategy and the right content, YouTube videos have a potential that should not be underestimated.
According to the current online study, YouTube has established itself as an almost monopoly for moving images on the internet. Competing networks like Facebook are just as beaten in this area as media libraries or video streaming services. But what possible uses does the channel offer for political communication?
Understanding public relation
The federal government, for example, uses YouTube to address voters directly. Under the politicians regularly addresses viewers in clips, usually less than three minutes long, in order to explain the positions of the Federal Government on a topic. Against a changing background, the Chancellor gives her monologue with subtitles, which she reads classically on the teleprompter. A network-friendly, square image format is selected – also known as the “Instagram video format“. Since the videos were created for various platforms, it is difficult to make a statement about their success.
This highlights a problem that is widespread among politicians in social media: Social media offers are “emotional media“, as blogger and strategy. Politicians have to dare the balancing act between factual politics and an attractive form of presentation. Common ways to make a video more attractive are fast music and fast cuts.
The Chancellor Videos do without both. Admittedly, the music and the rapid sequence of cuts would also not fit if into the camera about topics such as the growing economy and falling unemployment figures. The videos avoid any risk by sticking to tried and tested means of presentation, but they do not receive any special attention. Presumably, however, the intention is not to reach as many people as possible – but the right ones. Central statements are regularly taken up and quoted in various media with reference to the videos.
Explanatory videos are also popular on YouTube, often in a comic-like format. Such videos are also popular with NGOs to spread their own positions. Attach published explanatory videos on the subject of free trade agreements, and the organizations.
Explanatory videos are a popular way of drawing attention to yourself and your positions in marketing. There are now many agencies that offer their production at moderate prices. The drawn characters arouse sympathy in the audience and with the help of graphics and pictograms, even complicated facts can be The limits of the format
For a short time YouTube has also been used to publish its own videos in the form of news items. The function of the journalist as gatekeeper is deliberately called into question. Critical inquiries and classifications are not required.
Party television is now possible for the first time at affordable prices. The crucial question with these “broadcast yourself” videos, however, is: Is it fair to give your own PR messages a message?
Regardless of the objective they pursue – what all political YouTube videos have in common is that they compete on the channel for the attention of users with comedy, information articles, and make-up tutorials. The makers have to assess whether the organic reach of their own channel is large enough to reach the target audience. If the corresponding added value is offered, the videos have a chance to spread virally on the Internet, the video can also be converted into convert mp3 by the audience if they only want to listen. It’s not the rule, which is why a cross-platform strategy makes sense. Crossmedia is the keyword in an easily understandable manner. Both of these lead to the fact that this type of video particularly captivates the viewer and that the content remains present later.Read More