Author: Lea Schneider
As part of elections updates, there are arguments gathered from the impeachment investigation about the candidacy of Donald Trump as presidential candidate of the Republican party in 2020. The whole troupes of the US and the international opinion were aroused by Trump’s appointment last 2016. Because of this, most were feared the results.
An outspoken opposition to Trump was created even prior to the election. Their opposition was based on the assessment of Trump’s psychopathology. This discussion continues and progresses stating that Trump’s mental capacity poses a great peril to the US government and to international stability.
The continuation of the impeachment investigation is a coexistence of Trump’s mental concerns that is already receiving more attention. However, it is still of deepest controversy to discuss the mental health issues of political icons. This is also rooted from the “Goldwater Rule” which states that a psychiatrist, or even the mental health billing, offering a professional opinion relating to public figure is being unethical unless they are authorized to do so.
Importance of Discussing the Mental Health of Political Leaders
Concerns regarding the mental state of political leaders are valid reasons that need to be acted upon. Here are the reasons why discussing the mental health status of political leaders are really important.
Potential danger to the nation
Leaders of the society with mental incapacity may not be able to perform office duties and may even put danger to the nation.
There are political leaders with narcissistic personality disorder and sometimes showing of malevolence, lack of empathy, and aggression. This kind of leaders who have two disorders may not be able to put the country’s interests before their own. Political leaders lack of empathy could often make decisions that could have offered harmful consequences for the republic.
The ladder to authority
Another controversial topic related to mental health of politicians is the dangers of rising the leaders to power or authority. This rise needs three elements in order to sore high. The three elements include the leaders having psychological disorders, basic numbers of supporters, and a surrounding that is applicable to the elevation of authority.
Looking for a remedy
Usually, dangerous political leaders sore high to authority does not only give credit to their psychopathological issues. This also involves factors such as the underlying cultural, economic, and political justification for their glamor.Read More
In India alone, there had been an estimated 3.5 million need for care beds and 3 million doctors. Nontraditional solutions will have to be adopted by the government in order to accommodate this need. While the best mattresses in India can be provided for the elderly, the Indian government will have to rethink how to come up with the funds needed to supply this.
In Styria, studies on the care plan have shown that Styria needs additional 2310 care beds by 2020 due to the rapidly increasing proportion of older people. In the future, these will be approved precisely where they are needed.
Around 80 percent of all people in need of care in Styria are cared for at home. In order to make it easier for the caring relatives to work, State Councilor Edlinger-Ploder is planning a number of innovations.
Planned Innovations In Elderly Care Management
Mobile home nursing and day centers are being expanded. Case and care management should provide comprehensive advice and organize the optimal forms of care. Pilot tests will be carried out to determine whether anchoring to the district government or to the health center in the facility is more effective.
Assisted living is being expanded and conditions are being improved. The options for short-term care in the nursing home or transitional care in the hospital are being expanded and care service (the 4th service) for relatives is being installed.
Relatives’ advisory councils in nursing homes and at the state level are set up. Nursing relatives should be integrated into an advisory capacity and the wishes and concerns of the nursing staff and their relatives should be conveyed.
There is a blatant shortage of qualified personnel – also because many specialists are employed in hospitals. A personnel development plan is now to be drawn up. At the same time, Edlinger-Ploder wants to create a new group of employees, the “domestic service”, in the area of hospitals for non-nursing work, in order to free qualified staff for nursing homes and home nursing. New skills are defined and training courses are prepared.Read More
The United States Disability Act (ADA) of 1990, as modified, helps to protect the civil rights of persons with disabilities and helps to eliminate or cut down a large number of limitations to persons with disabilities.
Legislation requires the removal of conflicts with persons with disabilities. ADA expands options for persons with ailments by minimizing obstacles, changing perceptions and raising participation in the society.
Americans with Disabilities Act
Introduction of Universal Design to Cater to the Disabled
The goal of the universal design is to make everyone’s lives simple at little or no additional cost by making as many people as possible using the product, communication, and physical environments. Universal design gains people of all age groups and capabilities. The General Design Center at North Carolina State University has formulated a general design that could be helpful to many people including those with physical or mental disabilities such as early signs of dementia (tegn på dement) or Alzheimer’s disease.
Government involvement to boost the opportunities of the disabled is key to building a true opportunity society that caters to everyone regardless of age, sex, and capability. Social justice must be done to provide opportunities for people with disabilities, to allow them to choose, to empower, to encourage diversity, and to enhance the standard of living for everyone. Government support and service experience for the disabled should change. People with disabilities often struggle with distributed, complex, and bureaucratic systems. The requirements of the disabled should be at the center of any service delivery.
Barriers to health care have been in place for over 20 years since the achievement of the US Disability Act. Therefore, reducing them may necessitate clear and distinct interventions. Individuals with disabilities on occasion use court processes to deal with access to care. Following the approval of the US Disability Act, many people with disabilities filed a case against the Kaiser Permanente health system in California for discrimination against persons with disabilities.
Historically, disability was essentially considered a health and welfare issue, so state intervention had been carried out through social welfare institutions. This is why the responsibility to “take care” of people with disabilities often lies with civil society. In other areas of government responsibility, there is little commitment to tackling the problem of disability. Therefore, there is a huge call of government intervention to better protect the rights of persons with disability.Read More